Industries Sports & Entertainment E-commerce & Retail B2B SaaS & Tech Real Estate Financial Services Healthcare Travel & Hospitality More Industries Services Customer Experience Media Strategy & Management Content, SEO & AIO Analytics & CRO CRM & Email Performance Creative More Services Our Work Blog About Careers Press Tools Work With Us
SEO

Clio's Ranking Fix

Clio is the #1 legal software used globally. After four years of being stuck on page 2, we got Google to fix a hidden algorithm issue that was blocking Clio's rankings, and they rose to page 1 within days.

0
Days to Resolution
From initial Google contact to rankings recovery.
0M
Impressions Post-Fix
Total impressions recorded post-fix.
The Challenge

Stuck at position 11 for four years, for no visible reason.

After migrating from goclio.com to clio.com in November 2016, Clio's site became stuck at position 11 (top of page 2) for virtually all non-branded keywords. Despite being the clear market leader with excellent reviews and strong brand recognition, they couldn't break onto the first page of Google search results. The issue had persisted for nearly four years when they engaged us.

Our Strategy

Ruling out five theories, then going straight to Google.

01Systematic Elimination
Ruling out E-A-T, migration, technical, and policy issues

We systematically tested and ruled out five theories over nearly a year: expected rankings (via Quality Raters' Guidelines review showing strong E-A-T), migration issues (the migration was clean), technical issues (via multiple technical audits), and Google guidelines violations (no manual actions existed).

02Expert Validation
A 24-page analysis from a renowned algorithm expert

Marie Haynes, a renowned Google algorithm expert, was engaged to conduct a comprehensive 24-page analysis, further validating our work and lending significant credibility to our findings. She was equally stumped.

03The Evidence
A systemic pattern, not a content problem

The key evidence: Clio ranked #2 in Bing for the same keywords, proving content quality wasn't the issue. We discovered other domains with the identical "position 11" pattern, suggesting a systemic Google issue with legacy domain classification.

04Direct Outreach
Reaching the search team at Google directly

With conventional approaches exhausted, Intrepid reached out directly to the search team at Google with comprehensive documentation of the pattern and evidence.

"Getting the attention of someone at Google was truly the achievement, Jeremy! Thanks for making those reach-outs; the persistence clearly paid off."

— Jack Newton · Clio CEO
The Results

11 days from Google contact to rankings recovery.

Time to resolution: 11 days from initial Google contact to rankings recovery.
Position improvement: rankings jumped from position 40–60 (page 4-6) to position ~20 (page 2), with many keywords reaching page 1.
Impressions: 62M+ total impressions were recorded post-fix.
Timeline: September 16, 2020 (first contact with John Mueller) to September 27, 2020 (client confirmed recovery). The analysis revealed that other domains exhibited the identical "position 11 ceiling" pattern, suggesting this was a systemic Google issue, not an isolated Clio problem.
Work With Us

Ready to see what we can do for your brand?

We dig deeper than the usual playbook when rankings don't add up. Let's talk.

Work With Us